Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

When technology spend eats traders' PnL

If you're a trader and you want to get paid for your efforts rather than seeing your PnL drained by spending on technology, you probably want to trade fixed income products, for the moment at least.

This is the implication of the new report on buy-side trading technology from Coalition Greenwich. In fixed income, it says 76% of the trading desk budget goes on compensation. In equities, the comparable figure is 57%.

Coalition Greenwich looked at tech-spending versus people-spending on buy-side trading desks, but a similar distribution exists on the sell-side. Some areas of fixed income, currencies and commodities (FICC) trading are highly resistant to "electronification" (electronic market making without very little human intervention). As the chart below shows, 75% of the global interest rate swap market is still traded by human beings.   

It's not just trading systems that suck the budget on the buy-side. Greenwich says market data terminals account for a growing proportion of the spend in equities desks. By comparison, spend on execution management (EMS) systems appears to have plummeted as a percentage of the total in the past two years, but Greenwich says this is mostly because EMS have simply been combined with OMS and bundled into one.

The skew between technology and human beings helps explain why top fixed income traders in illiquid areas like high yield typically earn a lot more than equities traders in liquid markets.

However, just because technology isn't sucking more of the spend in fixed income trading on the buy-side right now, doesn't mean it won't do so in the future. Coalition Greenwich notes that electronic trading is encroaching upon the fixed income world as investment grade corporate bonds are increasingly traded electronically and that syndicated loans are going the same way. 

Increased electronification on the sell-side is prompting complaints from banks who fear the trading business could become uneconomic. In last year's annual report, Goldman Sachs noted that electronic trading is putting trading commissions under pressure, that this trend is likely to continue and that the market making business is simultaneously being impacted by price compression as bid/offer spreads narrow. 

Click here to create a profile on eFinancialCareers. Make yourself visible to recruiters hiring for top jobs in technology and finance. 

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: in the first instance. Whatsapp/Signal/Telegram also available (Telegram: @SarahButcher)

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

Photo by Kiryl Sharkouski on Unsplash


AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • pb
    13 May 2022

    Hint - Market Data will continue to be a major league sucker up of P&L. And it gets worse if managers, trying to save money, cheat or otherwise steal data and get caught. Almost as bad, if a firm cheaps out on its MDS department, it's a sure fire way to INCREASE Market Data costs.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Recommended Articles
Recommended Jobs

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.